EX PARTE CAMERON JARELL SMITH, Applicant (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-80,375-01 & -02 EX PARTE CAMERON JARELL SMITH, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 14640 & 14641 IN THE 29TH DISTRICT COURT FROM PALO PINTO COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). In Cause No. 14640, Applicant was convicted of manufacture or delivery of methamphetamine, and his punishment was assessed at forty years imprisonment. In Cause No. 14641, Applicant was convicted of manufacture or delivery of cocaine, and his punishment was assessed at twenty years imprisonment. Applicant s appeals were dismissed pursuant to his motions. Smith v. State, Nos. 11-12-00132-CR & 11-12-00133-CR (Tex. App. Eastland 2013, no pet.). Applicant contends that the affidavit used to obtain the search warrant was deliberately 2 falsified by the investigator. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall hold a live evidentiary hearing to obtain the testimony of Investigator Sergeant Scott Mitcham. The trial court may also call any other witnesses it feel necessary to determine the veracity of Applicant s claim. It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court determines he is not represented by counsel, it shall then determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the affidavit for a search warrant was deliberately falsified or made with reckless disregard for the truth. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: December 11, 2013 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
