EX PARTE CHARLES ALFRED JACKSON, Applicant (Other)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-79,910-01 EX PARTE CHARLES ALFRED JACKSON, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. C-1-009706-0810273-A IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 FROM TARRANT COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and indecency with a child by contact and sentenced to concurrent terms of sixty and twenty years imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions. Jackson v. State, No. 02-02-00198-CR (Tex.App. Fort Worth Mar. 20, 2003). Applicant contends, inter alia, that he was denied his right to pursue a pro se petition for discretionary review in this Court after his convictions were affirmed by the Fort Worth Court of Appeals. The trial court recommends that relief be granted, and the writ record supports the recommendation. See Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). -2Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Second Court of Appeals in Cause No. 02-02-00198-CR that affirmed his convictions in Cause No. 0810273D from the Criminal District Court No. 1 of Tarrant County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court s mandate issues. Applicant s remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice. See Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469, 474 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Delivered: September 18, 2013 Do not publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.