EX PARTE DAVID WAYNE MCCALL, Applicant (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-54,607-02 EX PARTE DAVID WAYNE MCCALL, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F96-03061-WJ IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). After a plea of nolo contendere and a period of deferred adjudication, Applicant was convicted of sexual assault and sentenced to life imprisonment. Fifth Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal for want of jurisdiction. McCall v. State, No. 05-99-01141-CR (Tex. App. Dallas March 30, 2000). Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by telling Applicant that he would not have to register as a sex offender for this offense and by telling him that his deferred adjudication supervision could not be revoked because of one dirty 2 urinalysis. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, ยง 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings as to whether counsel, at time of the initial plea, mistakenly informed Applicant that he would not have to register as a sex offender for this offense. The trial court shall make findings as to whether counsel, at the time of the adjudication of Applicant s guilt, informed him that one dirty urinalysis could not result in the revocation of his community supervision. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel s deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or 3 deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: October 23, 2013 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
