EX PARTE BOYD F. JAMES, Applicant (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-34,082-03 EX PARTE BOYD F. JAMES, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. B-18,126-B IN THE 161ST DISTRICT COURT FROM ECTOR COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment. Applicant contends, inter alia,1 that he is being denied credit for time spent in custody in Oklahoma while subject to pre-revocation warrants from Texas on two different occasions. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Canada, 754 S.W.2d 1 This Court has reviewed Applicant s claim that he is being improperly classified as ineligible to earn street time credit, and finds it to be without merit. 2 660 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Ex parte Price, 922 S.W.2d 957 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice s Office of the General Counsel to file an affidavit listing Applicant s sentence begin date and the dates of any releases to parole or mandatory supervision. The affidavit shall also list the dates of issuance and execution or withdrawal of any parole-revocation warrants. The affidavit should state whether or not Applicant is receiving credit for any of the time spent on parole and/or mandatory supervision while subject to pre-revocation warrants. The trial court may also order depositions, interrogatories or a hearing. In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . C ODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant is receiving the proper amount of time credit for any periods of time during which he was subject to pre-revocation warrants while on parole or mandatory supervision before revocation. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or 3 deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: June 12, 2013 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
