EX PARTE KEVIN FORD BATSON, Applicant (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-25,034-02 EX PARTE KEVIN FORD BATSON, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 27154-CR IN THE 13TH DISTRICT COURT FROM NAVARRO COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault and sentenced to forty years imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant contends that he waived his right to appeal and agreed to the State s recommendation on punishment based on counsel s advice that he would be eligible for release to parole in twelve years. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Moussazadeh, 361 S.W.3d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In these 2 circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant s claim. She shall state whether she advised Applicant that he would be eligible for release to parole in twelve years and, if so, whether she believed Applicant s decision to waive his right to appeal and accept the State s recommendation on punishment was based on this advice. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, ยง 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make further findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel s conduct was deficient and, if so, whether Applicant would not have waived his right to appeal and accepted the State s recommendation on punishment but for this deficient conduct. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant s claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. 3 Filed: March 6, 2013 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
