In Re PATRICK McCANN and ALBERT JAMES TURNER, Relators (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. AP-76,998 & AP-76,999 In Re PATRICK McCANN and ALBERT JAMES TURNER, Relators ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND WRIT OF PROHIBITION FROM CAUSE NO. 10-DCR54,233, ALBERT JAMES TURNER, APPLICANT, IN THE 268 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FORT BEND COUNTY Per Curiam. ORDER We have before us a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition, an application for a writ of mandamus, and an application for a writ of prohibition. The matter underlying this proceeding involves an order from the trial court ordering trial counsel to turn over his trial file so that habeas counsel can conduct a proper investigation before preparing an application for writ of habeas corpus on behalf McCann/Turner/Elliott - 2 of applicant, Albert James Turner. Trial counsel refused to turn over his file without a release signed by his client (applicant), and applicant refused to sign the release. The trial court then held relator counsel in contempt. On a motion for emergency relief, this Court stayed the enforcement of the contempt order and the order to disclose applicant s trial file pending further order of this Court. In re McCann, No. WR-76,984-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 7, 2013)(not designated for publication). This Court has determined that the cases should be filed and set and that both parties should brief the following issues: 1. To whom does a client s file belong? 2. If the file belongs to the client (the defendant in the underlying case here), what are the possible consequences should the client refuse to turn over the file to subsequent counsel? 3. If the file belongs to the client and the client is unable or unwilling to decide whether to turn over the file, to whom does that decision fall (e.g. former counsel, subsequent counsel, trial judge, or guardian appointed for that issue)? Briefs from both relator and respondent are due in this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. No motions for extension of time to file will be entertained. IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013. Do Not Publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
