BRADLEY JARED BARTON, Relator v. HON. SHAWNA REAGIN, JUDGE OF THE 176th DISTRICT COURT, Respondent (Other)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-76,811-03 BRADLEY JARED BARTON, Relator v. HON. SHAWNA REAGIN, JUDGE OF THE 176th DISTRICT COURT, Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. 1206429-B FROM HARRIS COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the 176th District Court of Harris County, and that the habeas application is currently pending in that court. Relator contends that the district court entered an order designating issues on June 4, 2012. On June 26, 2012, Relator alleges that he filed a motion to recuse or disqualify the trial judge from presiding over the habeas corpus proceedings. Relator alleges that the trial court has not taken action on that motion. 2 In Ex parte Sinegar, 324 S.W.3d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010), this Court held that the requirements of Rule 18a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, regarding the recusal of judges, applies in habeas proceedings conducted at the trial level. Therefore, if Relator filed a motion to recuse or disqualify the trial judge, the respondent judge had a ministerial duty, within three business days after the motion was filed, to either sign and file with the clerk an order of recusal or disqualification, or sign and file with the clerk an order referring the motion to the presiding judge of the administrative judicial region in which the court is located. Respondent, the Judge of the 176th District Court of Harris County, shall file a response with this Court by stating whether Relator s motion to recuse or disqualify was filed in that court, and if so, when. If Relator s motion was filed in the district court, Respondent shall state whether she has complied with the requirements of Rule 18a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and if not, why not. If Respondent has acted on the motion as required by Rule 18a, Respondent s answer should include copies of any written order ruling on Relator s motion. Respondent s answer shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted response. Filed: November 21, 2012 Do not publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
