State v. Sanavongxay (Original)
Annotate this CaseDefendant was charge with aggravated robbery. Because the trial court's notations on the defense motions at issue were not memorialized in a written order, the court of appeals dismissed the state's appeal for want of jurisdiction. The state appealed the dismissal to the court. The court held that State v. Rosenbaum did not need to be revised where Rosenbaum dealt with distinguishable facts; because there was no written order from which to appeal, the court of appeals correctly held that it had no jurisdiction over the state's appeal; and the court declined to address the State's remaining assertions. Accordingly, the judgment was affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.