EX PARTE DAVID LEE POWELL (other)

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 
OF TEXAS 

WR-7,407-03 
EX PARTE DAVID LEE POWELL
ON SUBSEQUENT APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 911524 IN THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT

TRAVIS COUNTY

Per Curiam. Womack and Johnson, JJ., not participating.O R D E R

This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071, 5.

Applicant was originally convicted of the offense of capital murder in September 1978. The jury answered the special issues submitted under Article 37.071 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed Applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Powell v. State, 742 S.W.2d 353 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987). The United States Supreme Court vacated and remanded, Powell v. Texas, 487 U.S. 1230 (1988), and this Court affirmed the conviction and sentence on remand, Powell v. State, 767 S.W.2d 759 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989). The Supreme Court thereafter reversed Applicant's conviction. Powell v. Texas, 492 U.S. 680 (1989). Applicant was convicted and sentenced to death for the second time in November 1991. On direct appeal, this Court affirmed the conviction, but vacated the death sentence and remanded for a new punishment trial. Powell v. State, 897 S.W.2d 307 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 808 (1995), overruled, Prystash v. State, 3 S.W.3d 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1102 (2000). Pursuant to the jury's answers to the special issues submitted to it in Applicant's third punishment trial, the trial court sentenced Applicant to death in March 1999. This Court affirmed Applicant's sentence on direct appeal. Powell v. State, No. 71,399 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 16, 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1015 (2002). This Court denied Applicant's initial post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, No. WR-7,407-02 (Tex. Crim App. Sept. 25, 2002)(not designated for publication). (1) Applicant's instant post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus was received in this Court on July 9, 2009.

Applicant presents one allegation. Applicant's claim fails to meet the dictates of Article 11.071, 5. Accordingly, we dismiss his application.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2009.

Do Not Publish

1. Applicant's -01 writ concerned his original conviction which was later reversed.