ARTHUR LEE WILLIAMS v. THE STATE OF TEXAS (concurring)

Annotate this Case
Texas Judiciary Online - HTML Opinion     Close This Window



















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS





No. PD-0470-07

ARTHUR LEE WILLIAMS, Appellant

v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS





On Discretionary Review of Case 09-06-000103-CR of the

Ninth Court of Appeals,

Montgomery County



Womack, J., filed a concurring opinion.





I agree with the Court's statement, ante, at 11, that "'destroy' is distinct from … 'alter.'" I write only to say that, while "destroy" and "alter" are different, they may not be mutually exclusive. When something is destroyed, it may be said to have been altered.



Filed November 26, 2008.

Publish.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.