Molitor v. State
Annotate this Case862 S.W.2d 615 (1993)
James Arthur MOLITOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 526-92.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
September 22, 1993.
Paul Decuir, Jr., Burnet, for appellant.
Ken Anderson, Dist. Atty., Sally Ray, Asst. Dist. Atty., Georgetown, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
Before the court en banc.
OPINION ON MOTION TO ABATE APPEALCAMPBELL, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of murder. The jury assessed punishment at life.
Appellant's conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Molitor v. State, 827 S.W.2d 512 (Tex.App.Austin 1992). We granted appellant's petition for discretionary review. In an opinion delivered on June 16, 1993, we reversed the judgment of the court *616 of appeals upon concluding that court had erroneously upheld the trial court's refusal to submit appellant's requested jury instruction on the lesser included offense of criminally negligent homicide. Molitor v. State (Tex. Cr.App. No. 526-92, delivered June 16, 1993).
The State has filed a motion to abate the appeal. Attached to the motion is a certified copy of appellant's certificate of death. The certificate recites that appellant died on March 31, 1993.
The death of an appellant during the pendency of an appeal deprives both this Court and the court of appeals of jurisdiction. See Garcia v. State, 840 S.W.2d 957 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992). Under these circumstances, the appropriate disposition is the abatement of the appeal. Tex.R.App.Pro. Rule 9(b). Accordingly, the State's motion for rehearing is dismissed, the prior opinion is withdrawn, and the appeal is permanently abated.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.