Keeling, M., Aplt. v. Fagan, et al. (per curiam order)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT MICHAEL E. KEELING, Appellant v. MR. FAGAN AND MRS. NEWBERRY, BOTH GRIEVANCE COORDINATORS FOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellees : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 30 EAP 2022 Appeal from the Order of Commonwealth Court dated July 7, 2022, at No. 166 M.D. 2021 ORDER PER CURIAM DECIDED: September 28, 2023 AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2023, the decision of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED IN PART and VACATED IN PART and the matter is REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for further proceedings consistent with this Order. In his petition for review addressed to the Commonwealth Court’s original jurisdiction, Petitioner/Appellant Michael E. Keeling (Keeling) alleges that he filed a grievance (perhaps more than one) relating to the confiscation of his “Venda Card,” which had a monetary value (or balance), while he was an inmate at the State Correctional Institution at Dallas (Venda Card Grievance). Keeling further alleges that Appellees have refused to process this particular grievance(s). Keeling sought, inter alia, an order from the Commonwealth Court, directing that Respondents/Appellees decide the Venda Card Grievance. “It is beyond dispute that money is property” and that “[p]rivate property cannot be taken by the government without due process.” Holloway v. Lehman, 671 A.2d 1179, 1181 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996). In Bronson v. Central Office Review Committee, 721 A.2d 357 (Pa. 1998), the Court recognized that inmates retain constitutional protections for personal or property interests not limited by Department of Corrections regulations. Accordingly, an inmate grievance final determination that affects such a personal or property interest is an adjudication subject to appellate review by the Commonwealth Court. See Bronson, 721 A.2d at 359. As the Commonwealth Court’s stated reasons for dismissing Keeling’s claim related to his Venda Card Grievance do not include consideration of the alleged property interest involved or whether the alleged inaction on Keeling’s Venda Card Grievance has frustrated Keeling’s ability to receive a final adjudication that would be appealable under Bronson, the Commonwealth Court’s July 7, 2022 Order dismissing Keeling’s petition for review in the nature of a complaint in mandamus is VACATED as to that particular claim only and REMANDED to the Commonwealth Court for further consideration. In all other respects, the Commonwealth Court’s July 7, 2022 Order is AFFIRMED. Keeling’s application for relief requesting leave to file a reply brief nunc pro tunc is DENIED as moot. [«JournalDocketNo»] - 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
