Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Decisions

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court dates from 1722 and was the first state supreme court to hold the authority to declare laws enacted by an elected legislature unconstitutional. The Court meets in Philadelphia, Harrisburg, and Pittsburgh. It is generally limited to appellate jurisdiction, but it holds original jurisdiction over cases involving writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, and quo warranto. Seven justices serve on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and their terms last for 10 years. To serve as a justice, a candidate must be a citizen of Pennsylvania and a member of the Bar of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Voters choose justices in partisan elections, which means that a candidate may appear on the ticket of their political party. Once a justice has served their first 10-year term, they will run in a retention election to determine whether they will serve another 10-year term. If the judge loses the retention election, the Governor of Pennsylvania will appoint an interim justice, subject to the approval of the Pennsylvania Senate. This justice will serve until the state holds a special election for a permanent justice. The most senior justice on the Supreme Court serves as the Chief Justice. Pennsylvania imposes a mandatory retirement age of 75 on Supreme Court justices.

A justice can be removed from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court if they are impeached by the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in a majority vote and convicted by the Pennsylvania Senate in a two-thirds vote. Alternatively, a justice can be removed following a complaint by the judicial conduct board or an individual. This will trigger an investigation in which the judicial conduct board will decide whether there is probable cause to file formal charges against the justice. If probable cause is found, the board will present the case against the justice to the court of judicial discipline. This court will determine whether discipline is appropriate and then decide whether to remove the justice or impose lesser sanctions.

Browse Opinions From the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Recent Decisions From the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Ferraro, B. v. Patterson-Erie, Aplt. (dissenting)
Date: April 25, 2024
Docket Number: 1 WAP 2023
Ferraro v. Patterson-Erie (majority)  
Date: April 25, 2024
Docket Number: 1 WAP 2023

Justia Opinion Summary: In this case, the plaintiff, Beverly Ferraro, slipped and fell at a Burger King restaurant in Butler County, Pennsylvania, and filed a negligence lawsuit against the restaurant's operators. Ferraro filed her complaint…

Kramer, S., et al. v. Nationwide Insurance, Aplt. (concurring)
Date: April 25, 2024
Docket Number: 103 MAP 2022
Kramer v. Nationwide Insurance (majority)  
Date: April 25, 2024
Docket Number: 103 MAP 2022

Justia Opinion Summary: The case involves a dispute between Stewart Kramer and Valerie Concinello (Parents) and Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Nationwide) over the interpretation of their homeowners insurance policy. The…

City of Lancaster v. PUC (majority)  
Date: April 25, 2024
Docket Number: 107 MAP 2022

Justia Opinion Summary: The case involves the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) and the City of Lancaster, Borough of Carlisle, and Borough of Columbia (collectively referred to as the Municipalities). The dispute centers around…

Bell, C., Aplt. v. DOC et al. (per curiam order)
Date: April 25, 2024
Docket Number: 13 WAP 2023
Hudson, B., Aplt. v. PPB (per curiam order)
Date: April 25, 2024
Docket Number: 17 WAP 2023
In the Matter of: Carolyn Purcell Reichenbach (disciplinary order)
Date: April 25, 2024
Docket Number: 18 RST 2024
Dwyer v. Ameriprise Financial (majority)  
Date: April 25, 2024
Docket Number: 2 WAP 2023

Justia Opinion Summary: The case involves Earl John and Christine Dwyer, who sued Ameriprise Financial, Inc. for negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation. In 1985, Ameriprise fraudulently and negligently induced the Dwyers to purchase a…

Rojas Casado, F., Aplt. v. DOC et al. (per curiam order)
Date: April 25, 2024
Docket Number: 82 MAP 2023
Commonwealth v. Drayton (majority)  
Date: April 25, 2024
Docket Number: 83 MAP 2023

Justia Opinion Summary: The case involves Lamarcus Eugene Drayton, who was charged with multiple counts of sexual assault against his nephew. The case proceeded to a jury trial, where Drayton was found guilty on all charges and sentenced to an…

Puricelli, B., Aplt. v. Dept. of Ed. et al. (per curiam order)
Date: April 25, 2024
Docket Number: 89 MAP 2023
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites. These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.