Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Decisions

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court dates from 1722 and was the first state supreme court to hold the authority to declare laws enacted by an elected legislature unconstitutional. The Court meets in Philadelphia, Harrisburg, and Pittsburgh. It is generally limited to appellate jurisdiction, but it holds original jurisdiction over cases involving writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, and quo warranto. Seven justices serve on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and their terms last for 10 years. To serve as a justice, a candidate must be a citizen of Pennsylvania and a member of the Bar of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Voters choose justices in partisan elections, which means that a candidate may appear on the ticket of their political party. Once a justice has served their first 10-year term, they will run in a retention election to determine whether they will serve another 10-year term. If the judge loses the retention election, the Governor of Pennsylvania will appoint an interim justice, subject to the approval of the Pennsylvania Senate. This justice will serve until the state holds a special election for a permanent justice. The most senior justice on the Supreme Court serves as the Chief Justice. Pennsylvania imposes a mandatory retirement age of 75 on Supreme Court justices.

A justice can be removed from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court if they are impeached by the Pennsylvania House of Representatives in a majority vote and convicted by the Pennsylvania Senate in a two-thirds vote. Alternatively, a justice can be removed following a complaint by the judicial conduct board or an individual. This will trigger an investigation in which the judicial conduct board will decide whether there is probable cause to file formal charges against the justice. If probable cause is found, the board will present the case against the justice to the court of judicial discipline. This court will determine whether discipline is appropriate and then decide whether to remove the justice or impose lesser sanctions.

Browse Opinions From the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Recent Decisions From the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Commonwealth v. Strait, H. (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Date: March 18, 2024
Docket Number: 222 WAL 2023
In Re: Nom. of Parker (per curiam order)
Date: March 18, 2024
Docket Number: 7 WAP 2024
ODC v. John R. Parroccini (disciplinary order)
Date: March 15, 2024
Docket Number: 3034 DD3
ODC v. Scott Ronald Gallant (disciplinary order)
Date: March 15, 2024
Docket Number: 3035 DD3
In Re: Appointment to Court of Judicial Discipline (appointment)
Date: March 15, 2024
Docket Number: 980 Supreme Court Rules
In Re: Appointment to Judicial Conduct Board (appointment)
Date: March 15, 2024
Docket Number: 981 Supreme Court Rules
In the Matter of: Ralph Thomas Borrello (disciplinary order)
Date: March 14, 2024
Docket Number: 11 RST 2024
Commonwealth v. Freeman, C. (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Date: March 13, 2024
Docket Number: 239 WAL 2023
Commonwealth v. Jackson, S. (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Date: March 13, 2024
Docket Number: 326 EAL 2023
Commonwealth v. Jackson, S. (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Date: March 13, 2024
Docket Number: 327 EAL 2023
Commonwealth v. Saez, R. (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Date: March 13, 2024
Docket Number: 514 MAL 2023
Commonwealth v. Hofmann, D. (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Date: March 13, 2024
Docket Number: 550 MAL 2023
Gall, C. v. Gall, P. (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Date: March 12, 2024
Docket Number: 164 WAL 2023
Commonwealth v. Purvis-Gilliam, C. (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Date: March 12, 2024
Docket Number: 167 EAL 2023
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites. These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.