ODC v. Craig B. Sokolow (disciplinary order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the Matter of CRAIG B. SOKOLOW PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT : : : : : : : No. 2652 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 83 DB 2018 Attorney Registration No. 61258 (Philadelphia) ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Reinstatement is denied. Petitioner is ordered to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.