David, C., et al. v. Chapman, L., et al. s. (miscellaneous)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT CHARLENE DAVID, ROSAMARIA TELEP, JACQUELINE PICKERING, AMY BRUCKNER, COLLEEN GRAY NGUYEN, JESSICA GITTENS, TONYA MORROW, MADELEINE SWEITZER, KERRY MILCH, JOSHUA FERRIS, AND GARY MINTZ, Respondents v. LEIGH CHAPMAN, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE ACTING SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; JESSICA MATHIS, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES, Petitioners : No. 8 MM 2022 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2022, Respondents’ Emergency Application for Extraordinary Relief Under 42 Pa. C.S. § 726 and Pa. R.A.P. 3309 is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. See Carter, et al. v. Chapman, et al., 7 MM 2022, per curiam order filed February 9, 2022 (suspending temporarily the dates for circulating and filing nomination petitions).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.