of: Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Davis, C, et al. (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CHARLES DAVIS AND KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS, INC. v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP AND THE HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE HARTFORD AND THE HARTFORD, Additional Defendants PETITION OF: HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY : No. 250 MAL 2022 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. Further, the Application for Leave to File Amicus Brief and the Application for Leave to file Post-Submission Communication are DENIED as moot.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
