ODC v. Charles M. Naselsky (disciplinary order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the Matter of CHARLES M. NASELSKY, PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT : : : : : : : No. 1888 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 169 DB 2012 Attorney Registration No. 51473 (Philadelphia) ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. Petitioner is ordered to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.