Trinh, L. v. Trinh, K., et al. (miscellaneous)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT LAN TU TRINH, Petitioner v. KATHLEEN LIEN TRINH AND LT INTERNATIONAL BEAUTY SCHOOL, INC., Respondents : No. 75 EM 2020 : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2020, the “Petitioner’s Motion to File Pro Se” is DISMISSED. This Court’s Prothonotary was mistaken when it instructed Petitioner to submit such a filing. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to process the previously submitted pro se filing in the normal course, including issuing any defect-correction notice.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.