Vazquez, et al., v. Bayer Corp. of: Bayer AG (miscellaneous)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT BRENDA I. VAZQUEZ, CHRISTINE V. FARNSTROM, VERONICA GARCIA, IRAIS J. HERNANDEZ, DEVRI V. HOWARD, MISTY D. HUNTER, MICHELLE L. JUDD, NATASHA M. RITCH, CLAUDIA GARNICA SERRATOS, SHANNON CARIE, KENDRA CLOUTIER, CHELSEA COOPER, APRIL GARCIA, COLEEN MORANOR, MELENIE SANDER, JACRISSA STEVENSON, MIRIAM ZUNIGA, MELISSA TOLLEY, KRISTEN GALO, CAROLE CARAMELA v. BAYER CORPORATION; BAYER U.S. LLC; BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC; BAYER ESSURE INC; BAYER HERALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC; BAYER AG; BAYER PHARMA AG; CONCEPTUS SAS; AND BAYER S.A. PETITION OF: BAYER AG; BAYER PHARMA AG; CONCEPTUS SAS; AND BAYER S.A. : No. 68 WM 2020 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, treated as a Petition for Review, is DENIED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.