In the Matter of Mohamed Alamgir (disciplinary order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the Matter of : : : : : : : MOHAMED ALAMGIR PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT No. 966 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 125 DB 2004 Attorney Registration No. 65321 (Out of State) ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the parties’ responses to the Court’s rule to show cause dated January 11, 2019, the rule is made absolute, and the Petition for Reinstatement is denied. Petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.