Commonwealth v. Bryant, L. (miscellaneous)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. LAQUAILLE BRYANT, Petitioner : No. 8 EM 2018 : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 2nd day of April, 2018, the King’s Bench Petition and the Application for Supersedeas are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282, 293 (Pa. 2010) (indicating that hybrid representation is not allowed). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.