Kleeman, M. v. Schrantz, E. and DOT (miscellaneous)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT MARK PAUL: KLEEMAN, IN ESSE AND SUI JURIS, CLAIMANT IN LAW, Petitioner v. ERIC M. SCHRANTZ, IN HIS OFFICIAL AND PRIVATE CAPACITY AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, T/D/B/A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER'S LICENSING, Respondents : No. 155 MM 2018 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for “Writ of Mandamus in the Nature of Equity” is DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.