Commonwealth v. Gill, R. - No. (Granted) (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. ROBERT PETER GILL, JR., Petitioner : No. 160 WAL 2017 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO Petitioner’s first issue, as stated by Petitioner: Whether absent of finding the Court of Common Pleas acted with manifest unreasonableness, partiality, prejudice, bias, or ill-will, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania erred in finding evidence of another burglary committed against the same victim, at the same location, also without the use of forcible entry, and also utilizing the same key to unlock the same lock box containing the same alleged amount of money taken from the same victim (3) years after the instant alleged burglary is not relevant to the defense of the crime for which Petitioner is charged and tends to prove a common scheme, plan, or design rendering the evidence admissible as evidence of similar crimes, behaviors, and/or acts[.] The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED in all other respects.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
