Commonwealth v. Rash, C. (miscellaneous)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. CHRISTIAN RASH, Petitioner : No. 95 WM 2016 : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.