Curtis, W. v. Canino, M. (miscellaneous)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT WILLIAM CURTIS, Petitioner v. MARY CANINO HEARING EXAMINER, Respondent : No. 9 EM 2016 : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2016, the Petition for Review is DENIED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.