Office of Admin & PSP s v. SERB - No. (Granted) (petitions for allowance of appeal)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION AND PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, Petitioners v. STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent BRUCE A. EDWARDS, JOSESPH R. KOVEL, JOSEPH E. SARKIS, PA STATE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION, Intervenors M.D. Appeal Dkt. 77 MAP 2016 : No. 76 MAL 2016 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by Petitioners, is as follows: Did [the] Commonwealth Court erroneously affirm the decision of the State Employees’ Retirement Board that union stipends, paid to union officers to work exclusively for the union, are retirement-covered compensation, when that decision was clearly contrary to the mandates of the State Employees’ Retirement Code and inconsistent with decisions of this Honorable Court?

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.