Yenchi, E. v. Ameriprise Financial, et al s. - No. (Granted) (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT EUGENE R. YENCHI AND RUTH I. YENCHI, HUSBAND AND WIFE, Respondents v. AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL, INC., AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., RIVERSOURCE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND BRYAN GREGORY HOLLAND, Petitioners : No. 493 WAL 2015 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are as follows: (1) Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the decision of the trial court to grant summary judgment in favor of Petitioners on the grounds that Respondents had not adduced sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case that a fiduciary relationship existed between the parties; and (2) Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the decision of the trial court with respect to Petitioners’ motions in limine and granting Respondents’ request for a new trial on their fraudulent misrepresentation and Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law claims.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
