Miller, S., DA v. County of Centre, et al - No. (Granted) (petitions for allowance of appeal)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT STACY PARKS MILLER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Petitioner v. COUNTY OF CENTRE; SEAN P. MCGRAW; ANDREW SHUBIN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, D/B/A/ THE LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW SHUBIN; BERNARD F. CANTORNA, ESQUIRE, BRYANT & CANTORNA, P.C.; AND JOHN DOES 1-5, Respondents STACY PARKS MILLER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Petitioner v. COUNTY OF CENTRE; SEAN P. MCGRAW; ANDREW SHUBIN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, D/B/A/ THE LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW SHUBIN; BERNARD F. CANTORNA, ESQUIRE, BRYANT & CANTORNA, P.C.; AND JOHN DOES 1-5, Respondents : No. 263 MAL 2016 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 264 MAL 2016 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Commonwealth Court : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is: Do district attorneys and their offices constitute “judicial agencies” as defined under Section 102 of the Right-toKnow-Law, 65 P.S. § 67.102? [263 MAL 2016 and 264 MAL 2016] - 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.