Heidelberg, C., Aplt v. PA Bd. of Prob. and Parole (per curiam order)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT CAL HEIDELBERG JR., Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Appellee : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 26 WAP 2015 Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court entered October 26, 2015 at No. 494 MD 2015. ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2016, we VACATE the Order of the Commonwealth Court. We REMAND this case to the Commonwealth Court for further consideration in its appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 763 (providing that an appeal from an order of a Commonwealth agency is directed to the Commonwealth Court’s appellate jurisdiction) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 708(c) (providing that where a complaint in the nature of mandamus is commenced against a government unit objecting to a governmental determination, where the proper mode of relief is an appeal from that determination, the court shall regard it as an appeal from that determination).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
