In the Matter of Michael Radbill (disciplinary order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the Matter of MICHAEL RADBILL PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT : : : : : : : No. 932 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Nos. 113 DB 2004 Attorney Registration No. 17053 (Philadelphia) ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2015, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, the Petition for Reinstatement is denied. Petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement, pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.