rizzo v. ZHB of Middle Smithfield, et al (petitions for allowance of appeal)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT JOHN PETRIZZO v. THE ZONING HEARING BOARD OF MIDDLE SMITHFIELD TOWNSHIP, MONROE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. v. ZONING HEARING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLE SMITHFIELD ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, BY ITS MANAGING GENERAL PARTNER, ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., AND EDWARD T. REGINA v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLE SMITHFIELD PETITION OF: ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, BY ITS MANAGING GENERAL PARTNER, ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., AND EDWARD T. REGINA : No. 796 MAL 2014 : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Commonwealth Court : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. [796 MAL 2014] - 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
