Socko, D. v. Mid-Atantic Systems of CPA, Inc. Aplt (concurring)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[J-40-2015][M.O. – Todd, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT DAVID M. SOCKO, Appellee v. MID-ATLANTIC SYSTEMS OF CPA, INC., Appellant : : : : : : : : : : : No. 142 MAP 2014 Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court at No. 1223 MDA 2013, dated 5/13/14, reconsideration denied 7/8/14 affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County dated 10/15/12 at No. 2012-SU-001608-44 ARGUED: May 6, 2015 CONCURRING OPINION MR. CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR DECIDED: November 18, 2015 I join the majority opinion, subject to the reservation that I have difficulty with the oft-repeated phrase that a seal operates “to import consideration.” Majority Opinion, slip op. at 7. Notably, in the first instance, the common law seal predated by centuries the modern requirement of consideration. See 4 W ILLISTON ON CONTRACTS §8:2 (4th ed. 2015). Although at some point in the development of the pertinent legal landscape, the phrase “import[] consideration” appears to have meant simply that signers undertook their obligations intentionally, as the term “consideration” evolved in its modern sense courts began to suggest that the seal itself “import[ed],” or stood as a presumption of, consideration. See id. However, “[i]t would have been more correct to have said that no consideration was needed for such a document.” Id. I realize that our Court has contributed to the imprecision. See, e.g. Morgan’s Home Equip. Corp. v. Martucci, 390 Pa. 618, 629, 136 A.2d 838, 845 n.12 (1957). Nevertheless, I believe that it would benefit the jurisprudence to clarify the effect of a statement of intention to be bound, per the Uniform Written Obligations Act in its general application, as dispensing with the requirement for consideration rather than supplying it. [J-40-2015][M.O. – Todd, J.] - 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.