Christopher Caldwell, Aplt. v. Pa. Department of Corrections, et al. (Per Curiam Order)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER CALDWELL, : : Appellant : : : v. : : : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : CORRECTIONS, HARRY E. WILSON, : EX-SUPERINTENDENT OF S.C.I. : FAYETTE, D.P. BURNS, DEPUTY : SUPERINTENDENT OF S.C.I. FAYETTE, : RHONDA HOUSE, SUPERINTENDENT : ASSISTANT II AT S.C.I. FAYETTE, : CINDY G. WATSON, CHIEF GRIEVANCE : OFFICER OF PENNSYLVANIA : DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, : MARY ANN KRUSHNER, : ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF S.C.I. : FAYETTE, CHARLES POWLEY, EX-UNIT: MANAGER AT S.C.I. FAYETTE, LT. : CRUMP, AT S.C.I. FAYETTE, DALE : HOSTOVICH, C.I. SUPERVISOR AT : S.C.I. FAYETTE, MIKE HOWARD, : EMPLOYMENT OFFICIAL AT S.C.I. : FAYETTE, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, : SUPERINTENDENT AT S.C.I. FAYETTE, : TAMMY CESARINO, UNIT MANAGER AT : S.C.I. FAYETTE, JUDY CAMINO, : EMPLOYMENT OFFICIAL ASSISTANT : AT S.C.I. FAYETTE, SUMMER DUGAN, : COUNSELOR AT S.C.I. FAYETTE, LEON : (OR LEE) JOHNSON, C.O. 1 AT S.C.I. : FAYETTE, LT. CLARENCE BLAKELEY : AT S.C.I. FAYETTE, C.O. 1 MOATS, AT : S.C.I. FAYETTE, LT. HOOPER AT S.C.I. : FAYETTE, CAPT. MANCHAS, AT S.C.I. : FAYETTE, UNIT MANAGER TUGGLE, : No. 13 WAP 2010 Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court entered April 9, 2010 at No. 251 M.D. 2009. AT S.C.I. FAYETTE, C.E.R.T. TEAM : CORRECTIONAL OFFICER VARNER, : C.E.R.T. TEAM CORRECTIONAL : OFFICER JOHN DOE #1, C.E.R.T. TEAM : CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE : #2, C.E.R.T. TEAM CORRECTIONAL : OFFICER JOHN DOE #3, C.E.R.T. TEAM : CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE : #4, AND ANY AND ALL OTHER : PERSONS NOT NAMED BUT INVOLVED : WITH THE ACTION AT HAND, : : : Appellees : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2010, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. Appellant s complaint is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County. See Hill v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, 679 A.2d 773, 774 n. 1 (Pa. 1996).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.