Fessler v. Hannagan, Geelhard, et al. (Per Curiam Order)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT JOSEPH A. FESSLER AND ANN FESSLER, HIS WIFE : : : : v. : : : LEONORA HANNAGAN, RICHARD : GEELHARD, MANNY WHITMEN, JOHN : WOJTOWICZ, RONALD HILLARD, LEWIS : ATTORDO, DWIGHT DAVIES, THOMAS : MORRISARY, HUGH MUNDY, LEON : CASE, THE CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, : INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR : CAPACITIES AS EMPLOYEES OF : REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE : CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, LAWRENCE : SINDACO, ESQ., FLANAGAN, DORAN, : BISCONTINI AND SHAFFER, JAMES : PALERMO, ESQ., SANDRA SERNAK, : ESQ., DAVID MILLER, ESQ., WILKES: BARRE, CITY ZONING, PAUL CAIN, : WILLIAM THOMPSON, KENNETH : FINLAYSON, ROBERT KAPLAN, MARTIN : J. MYER AND JOHN SWATKOSLI, : : : APPEAL OF: MICHAEL SHEMONSKY : No. 119 MAP 2006 Appeal from the per curiam Order of the Commonwealth Court dated October 11, 2006 at No. 1642 CD 1991. ORDER PER CURIAM The Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed. DECIDED: June 1, 2007

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.