In re: Nominating Petition of John L. Braxton (Summary Disposition)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT IN RE: NOMINATING PETITIONS OF JOHN L. BRAXTON OBJECTION OF: ALAN BUTKOVITZ PETITION OF: ALAN BUTKOVITZ : No. 217 EAL 2005 : : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Commonwealth Court : : : : : ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. Respondent did not disclose anywhere on his Statement of Financial Interests the sources of his rental income and the names and addresses of the creditors holding mortgages on his rental properties. See 65 Pa.C.S. §1105(b)(4), (b)(5). In light of these omissions, the Order of the Commonwealth Court, which allowed Respondent to amend his Statement of Financial Interests and remain on the ballot, is REVERSED, and Respondent John L. Braxton s name is ordered to be STRICKEN from the primary ballot for the Democratic Party nomination for the Office of Controller in the City of Philadelphia. See 65 Pa.C.S. §1104(b)(3) (providing that the [f]ailure to file the statement in accordance with the provisions of this chapter shall . . . be a fatal defect to a petition to appear on the ballot ); see also In re Nomination Petition of Benninghoff, 578 Pa. 402, 411, 852 A.2d 1182, 1187 (2004) (interpreting the fatal defect rule of Section 1104(b)(3) as permitting an amendment to a financial statement where a candidate has substantially complied with the Ethics Act, such as where all of the statutorily required disclosures can be facially obtained from the information provided on the form as a whole ).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
