OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, PET. V. ANONYMOUS ATTORNEY, RES. (Dissenting Statement)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

J-100-2000 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 449 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : Disciplinary Board No. 22 DB 1998 : : v. : : : ANONYMOUS ATTORNEY, : : Respondent : DISSENTING STATEMENT MR. JUSTICE NIGRO FILED: SEPTEMBER 27, 2000 I dissent because I find that there was clear and sufficient evidence to establish that Respondent committed numerous violations of Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.