IN RE: APPOINTMENT OF THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ADVISORY BOARD
Annotate this Case
IN RE: APPOINTMENT OF THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ADVISORY BOARD
2006 OK 3
Case Number: SCAD-2006-7
Decided: 01/24/2006
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
IN RE: APPOINTMENT OF THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ADVISORY BOARD
ORDER APPOINTING BOARD MEMBERS
¶1 Pursuant to 12 O.S. 1991, § 1803.1, the following persons are hereby appointed by category to positions on the Dispute Resolution Advisory Board:
James M.
Cox Law Enforcement
Midwest City, Oklahoma
Carol M.
Hansen The Judiciary
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Michael T.
Oakley Department of Corrections
Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma
Thornton Wright,
Jr. Legal Profession
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Jonna S.
Geitgey Social Service Agencies
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Stan
Foster Consumer Organizations
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Lisa
Yates Business Organizations
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Ted
Roberts Academic Community
Norman, Oklahoma
Cathy
Stocker District Attorney
Enid, Oklahoma
Ralph Triplett,
Jr. Local Government
Woodward, Oklahoma
Jane F.
Wheeler State Government
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Terry
Winn Member At Large
Chickasha, Oklahoma
Christi Winkle
Roach Member At Large
Stillwater, Oklahoma
Bobbie Burbridge
Lane Member At Large
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
June W.
Morgan Retired Citizens
Norman, Oklahoma
Michael D.
Evans Ex Officio
Oklahoma City, OK
¶2 These appointments shall be effective July 1, 2005, and shall expire June 30, 2006, but the members shall continue to hold office until their successors are appointed and qualified.
¶3 Pursuant to Rule 5, part B of the Rules and Procedures for the Dispute Resolution Act, James M. Cox of Midwest City, Oklahoma, is designated by the Supreme Court as Chairperson of the Dispute Resolution Advisory Board for the term beginning July 1, 2005, and ending June 30, 2006.
DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE this 23rd day of January, 2006.
/S/VICE CHIEF JUSTICE
¶4 WATT, C.J., WINCHESTER, V.C.J., LAVENDER, HARGRAVE, KAUGER, EDMONDSON, TAYLOR and COLBERT, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.