Regan v. Gurich

Annotate this Case

Regan v. Gurich
1995 OK 110
905 P.2d 796
66 OBJ 3277
Case Number: 86116
Decided: 10/17/1995
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

PATRICK REGAN, PETITIONER,
v.
NOMA D. GURICH, JUDGE OF THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT, H40 DRILLING AND STATE INSURANCE FUND, RESPONDENTS.

[905 P.2d 796]

ORDER

¶1 The Motion to Supplement Record tendered by respondent/State Insurance Fund is granted.

¶2 Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let the writ of mandamus issue. The respondent/judge of the Workers' Compensation Court is hereby directed to set for hearing the petitioner's Motion to Reopen for change of condition for the worse in Court Number 92-14325A. The trial judge was in error when she denied the petitioner the status of a pauper solely on the basis of his being represented by counsel. The fact that the petitioner is represented by counsel does not in and of itself foreclose his right to proceed in forma pauperis. Okla. Const. art. II, § 6; Brown v. Burkett, 750 P.2d 481, 483 (Okla. 1988); McMullin v. Department of Corrections, 863 P.2d 1187, 1189 (Okla. 1993).

¶3 [905 P.2d 797] ALMA WILSON, C.J., KAUGER, V.C.J., HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE, OPALA and WATT, JJ., concur Vote on Motion to Supplement Record and For Publication.

¶4 SUMMERS, J., dissents Vote on Motion to Supplement Record and For Publication.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.