Smith v. State ex rel. Dept. of Transportation

Annotate this Case

Smith v. State ex rel. Dept. of Transportation
1994 OK 61
875 P.2d 1147
65 OBJ 1944
Case Number: 75807
Decided: 06/07/1994
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

JOELLA SMITH, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF VESTIL LEON SMITH, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL., DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLEE.

On Certiorari to the Court of Appeals, Division 2.

¶0 Plaintiff/appellant filed a claim for death benefits in the Workers' Compensation Court and filed this action for damages caused by the wrongful death of her husband. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the State, concluding that the State was immune from liability by 51 O.S.Supp. 1988 § 155 (14). The Court of Appeals affirmed.

Certiorari Previously Granted; Court of Appeals Opinion Vacated; Trial Court Affirmed.

Paul E. Quigley, Derryberry, Quigley, Parrish, Solomon and Blankenship, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Robert H. Henry, Atty. Gen., Julie Jones Corley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

ALMA WILSON, Justice:

[875 P.2d 1148]

¶1 The issues raised on certiorari are whether the opinion of the Court of Appeals herein, interpreting 51 O.S.Supp. 1988 § 155 (14), conflicts with prior decisional law and violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. We conclude that the issues presented are governed by Childs v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma State University, 848 P.2d 571 (Okla. 1993). We hold that 51 O.S.Supp. 1988 § 155 (14) grants sovereign immunity to the appellee State of Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Transportation from liability to the appellant Joella Smith, personal representative of the estate of Vestil Leon Smith, deceased, as a third-party tortfeasor for the wrongful death of Vestil Leon Smith.

¶2 The material facts are undisputed. On January 25, 1989, while acting within the scope of his employment, Vestil Leon Smith was fatally injured when he lost control of his tractor-trailer on State Highway 31. In April of 1989, Smith's surviving spouse, Joella Smith (appellant), filed a workers' compensation claim for death benefits. In August of 1989, appellant filed this action for wrongful death against the State, alleging that the Department of Transportation had knowledge of the unsafe conditions of Highway 31 and that the Department failed to correct the conditions and/or to give warning of the conditions. By motion for summary judgment, the State asserted that it was immune from liability by 51 O.S.Supp. 1988 § 155 (14). The trial court granted summary judgment and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

¶3 Childs v. State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma State University was pronounced subsequent to our granting certiorari herein. Childs considered the application of § 155(14) to a claim for wrongful death of a Texas resident fatally injured while acting in the course of his employment. Upon review of our opinions in Jarvis v. City of Stillwater, 669 P.2d 1108 (Okla. 1983), and Huff v. State, 764 P.2d 183 (Okla. 1988),

¶4 OPINION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS IS VACATED; SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF THE DISTRICT COURT IS AFFIRMED.

¶5 All Justices concur.

Footnotes:

1 Because of our subsequent opinion in Childs, the Court of Appeals opinion, released for publication, is vacated. However, we note that, consistent with Childs, the Court of Appeals determined the 1988 version of § 155(14), plainly and without ambiguity, provides governmental immunity from tort claims by both state and nonstate employees where those claims are covered by workers' compensation laws and the grant of sovereign immunity in § 155(14) is not constitutionally infirmed.

2 Jarvis and Huff concluded that pre-1988 versions of § 155(14) provided governmental immunity against claims by governmental employees covered by workers' compensation laws of this state.

3 The 1988 version of § 155(14), 1988 Okla. Sess. Laws, ch. 241, § 2, which remains unchanged and is codified at 51 O.S. 1991 § 155 (14), provides:

The state or a political subdivision shall not be liable if a loss or claim results from:

14. Any loss to any person covered by any workers' compensation act or any employers' liability act;

4 Childs, 848 P.2d at 576.

5 Childs, 848 P.2d at 576-578.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.