FORESMAN v. ARRINGTON

Annotate this Case

FORESMAN v. ARRINGTON
1954 OK 114
270 P.2d 662
Case Number: 36375
Decided: 04/13/1954
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Syllabus by the Court

¶0 The Supreme Court is without jurisdiction to review an appeal which is not lodged within three months of the final order or a legal extension of said three months.

Appeal from the District Court of Oklahoma County, Clarence Mills, J.

Breck Moss, George Miller, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

Pierce, Mock & Duncan, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

O'NEAL, J.

¶1 Judgment was entered for the defendants on November 3, 1952, and a motion for new trial was overruled September 11, 1953. On November 25, 1953, the trial court allowed 60 days in addition to the time allowed by law for filing the appeal. The time allowed by law expired December 11, 1953; the 60 days expired February 9, 1954. The case-made was filed in this court February 26, 1954.

¶2 A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason the appeal was not lodged in this court within time. The motion must be sustained. 12 O.S. 1951 § 972 provides that all proceedings to review judgments and final orders must be filed within three months or within an extended time not exceeding six months. East Side Baptist Church v. Morgan, 204 Okl. 685, 233 P.2d 957; Adams v. Hobbs, 204 Okl. 85, 226 P.2d 913; Sheets v. Sheets, 204 Okl. 88, 226 P.2d 915; Dahlenburg v. Young, 206 Okl. 422, 243 P.2d 983.

¶3 Since the appeal was not filed within the time granted by the extension it is dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.