KRUMME v. WALKER

Annotate this Case

ALEXANDER v. RAINEY
1911 OK 71
114 P. 710
28 Okla. 518
Case Number: 1795
Decided: 03/21/1911
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

ALEXANDER
v.
RAINEY, County Treasurer.

Syllabus

¶0 TAXATION--Property Subject--Lands of Indians. Section 4 of an act of Congress of May 27, 1908, c. 199, 35 Stat. 312, 313, entitled "An act for the removal of restrictions from part of the lands of allottees of the Five Civilized Tribes, and for other purposes," is valid, and under and by virtue thereof the lands of all allottees of the Five Civilized Tribes of Indians from which restrictions have been or shall be removed, are subject to taxation under the general laws of the state equally with the property of all persons.

Error from District Court, Hughes County; John Caruthers, Judge.

Action by George A. Alexander against M. P. Rainey, County Treasurer. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.

Kane J., dissenting.
W. L. Sturdevant and Grant Foreman, for plaintiff in error.
Charles West, Atty. Gen., and Charles L. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

DUNN, J.

¶1 The above-entitled cause presents error from the district court of Hughes county.

¶2 The issues presented are identical in all respects with those of the case of Gleason v. Wood, ante, 114 P. 703, except as the same are applicable to the allottees of the Creek or Muskogee Tribe of Indians, and the opinion of the court in that case is adopted and promulgated as the opinion in this one.

¶3 The judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the petition is accordingly affirmed.

¶4 TURNER, C. J., and HAYES and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur; KANE, J., dissents.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.