ROURKE v. BURGE

ROURKE v. BURGE
1944 OK 102
147 P.2d 993
194 Okla. 468
Case Number: 31106
Decided: 02/21/1944
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

ROURKE et al.
v.
BURGE et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal of appeal where not filed within six-month period.
An appeal filed in this court after the expiration of six months from the entry of the final order appealed from will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Appeal from District Court, Oklahoma County; Albert C. Hunt, Judge.

Action by C. O. Burge et al. against S. A. Rourke et al. From an adverse judgment, defendants appeal. Appeal dismissed.

S. A. Rourke, of Oklahoma City, pro se, for plaintiffs in error.
Tom W. Garrett, of Oklahoma City, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 On January 2, 1942, a default judgment was rendered against S. A. Rourke and others interested with him in this litigation. On February 7, 1942, a petition to vacate that judgment was filed. That petition was denied on February 21, 1942. On the same day another judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. A motion for new trial, filed on February 25, 1942, by the attorneys for Rourke and those he now is interested with, was overruled on February 26, 1942. On February 25, 1942, Rourke filed a second motion for new trial, and on February 26, 1942, he filed a supplemental motion for new trial. On March 5, 1942, he filed a motion to vacate the judgment on the ground of newly discovered evidence. And on the same day he filed a motion to vacate an order requiring him to make a supersedeas bond. On March 6, 1942, the four last mentioned motions were overruled. On September 8, 1942, Rourke, for himself and those interested with him in this litigation, filed in this court a petition in error with case-made attached seeking to vacate the orders of February 26, 1942, and March 6, 1942. The plaintiffs have moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal was lodged in this court more than six months from the rendition of the orders complained of. This motion must be sustained. See 2 0. S. 1941 § 972; Miller v. Mentzer, 186 Okla. 496, 98 P.2d 913; Finch v. Smith, 166 Okla. 68, 26 P.2d 750.

¶2 Appeal dismissed.

¶3 CORN, C.J., GIBSON, V.C.J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, and HURST, JJ., concur.