READ v. LLOYDS AMERICA

READ v. LLOYDS AMERICA
1937 OK 595
72 P.2d 502
181 Okla. 92
Case Number: 27302
Decided: 10/19/1937
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

READ
v.
LLOYDS AMERICA

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal of Appeal Where It Becomes Moot.
Where a motion to dismiss has been filed on the ground that the appeal has become moot and the facts alleged in the motion to dismiss reasonably disclose that said appeal is moot, and the court calls for a response to such motion and none is filed, and no excuse is offered for a failure to comply with the order of the court, the motion will be taken as confessed and the appeal dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Oklahoma County; Ben Arnold, Judge.

Application by Lloyds America for writ of mandamus against Jess G. Read, State Insurance Commissioner. From an order refusing to stay proceedings thereon, defendant appeals. Dismissed.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for plaintiff in error.
Gibson & Savage, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This was an application on behalf of the defendant in error for a writ of mandamus to require the State Insurance Commissioner to issue a permit to do business as an automobile concern in this state. The district court issued a writ in mandamus and refused to stay execution upon application of the State Insurance Commissioner, and thereupon the State Insurance Commissioner appealed and applied to this court for such stay, which was on July 13, 1936,denied. On July 14, 1937, the defendant in error filed its motion to dismiss alleging in substance that House Bill 304, c. 51, art. 6, of the Session Laws 1937, has become effective and defendant in error is now licensed. On July 27, 1937, this court called for a response by the plaintiff in error, but none has been filed. No excuse is offered for such failure, and this court will consider the motion confessed.

¶2 The appeal is dismissed.