SCHEIRMAN v. PEMBERTON

Annotate this Case

SCHEIRMAN v. PEMBERTON
1937 OK 362
68 P.2d 857
180 Okla. 196
Case Number: 26937
Decided: 06/01/1937
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Scheirman
v.
Pemberton

Syllabus by the Court.

¶0 ABATEMENT AND REVIVAL--Action for Malicious Prosecution Held to Abate Where Plaintiff Dies Before Judgment
Civil action for malicious prosecution held not to survive where plaintiff died before judgment. Statutes 1931, §§ 568, 569 (12 Okl.St.Ann. §§ 1051, 1052).

Appeal from District Court, Kingfisher County; J. W. Bird, Judge.

Action by P. L. Scheirman against Zeda C. Pemberton, wherein defendant filed a demurrer. From a judgment sustaining the demurrer, plaintiff appealed, and on his death defendant moved to dismiss. Action dismissed.

Karl D. Cunningham, of Kingfisher, for plaintiff in error.
T. R. Blaine, of Kingfisher, for defendant in error.

RILEY, Justice.

¶1 P. L. Scheirman commenced this action to recover on account of a malicious prosecution. The defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's petition was sustained, and plaintiff appealed. Pending the appeal and on January 2, 1937, plaintiff died. Defendants below, defendants in error, move to dismiss, contending that the cause of action does not survive the death of plaintiff.

¶2 The action for malicious prosecution did not at common law survive the death of plaintiff. Likewise in Bellis v. Smith, 160 Okl. 294, 17 P. (2d) 975, and Loeser v. Loeser, 50 Okl. 249, 150 P. 1045, this court held that the cause of action for malicious prosecution abated upon the death of defendant.

¶3 In Alles v. Interstate Power Co. et al., 176 Okl. 252, 55 P. (2d) 751, we held that a civil action for libel did not survive where plaintiff died before judgment.

¶4 By section 568, O.S.1931 (Okl.Stat.Ann. title 12, § 1051), the causes of action which survived at common law were enlarged. However, the action for malicious prosecution was not included within the enlargement.

¶5 Section 569, O.S.1931 (Okl.Stat.Ann. title 12, § 1052), has been held in the cause last above cited to be a procedural statute which does not operate to grant survival in the class of cases here involved, and such as are stated in the section, and made by the statute to abate by the death of the defendant.

¶6 Since the cause of action for malicious prosecution cannot survive by any grant of right under the latter section, and since the enlargement of the rule applicable at common law by the former section did not extend to the action for malicious prosecution, the cause of action must be held to abate. State ex rel. Mitchell v. City of Shawnee et al., 167 Okl. 582, 31 P. (2d) 552, 92 A.L.R. 948.

¶7 The action is dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.