INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY CO. v. WOODWATSON MACH. WORKS

INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY CO. v. WOODWATSON MACH. WORKS
1936 OK 27
53 P.2d 554
175 Okla. 505
Case Number: 26711
Decided: 01/14/1936
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY CO.
v.
WOOD-WATSON MACH. WKS.

Syllabus

¶0 1. APPEAL AND ERROR - REVIEW - Motions and Rulings Thereon not Part of Record.
Motions and rulings thereon are not a part of the record; and unless incorporated in a case-made or bill of exceptions, errors presented thereon will not be considered by the court.
2. SAME - Dismissal of Appeal Where not Perfected Within Six Months Period.
Where proceedings on appeal are not commenced in this court until more than six months after the date of the final order or judgment rendered, the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Pottawatomie County; Leroy Cooper, Judge.

Action to foreclose lien by the Wood-Watson Machine Works against Vern H. Brown and others; Otis Hardin and R.L. Blackburn, doing business as the Tonkawa Bit & Machine Shop and the International Supply Company et al. intervening. From judgment for interveners first named, the International Supply Company appeals. Dismissed.

Edwin A. Deupree, for plaintiff in error.
Park Wyatt and Byron Lamun, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This appeal is by transcript. The final order from which the appeal is taken was entered April 4, 1935. Thereafter plaintiff in error filed a motion for new trial which was overruled on April 30, 1935. A motion to dismiss has been filed under the familiar rule that the appeal must be taken within six months from the date of the judgment rendered for the reason that motions for new trial and rulings made thereon are not a part of the record unless incorporated in a case-made or bill of exceptions and presented to this court; and that where no case-made is served or bill of exceptions taken, the date to appeal expires six months from the date of the rendition of the original judgment. Richardson v. Beidleman, 33 Okla. 463, 126 P. 818; Chase v. Byrnes, 147 Okla. 118, 294 P. 786; In re Welfelt's Estate, 142 Okla. 110, 285 P. 843.

¶2 A response has been filed in which it is stated that on the 30th day of April, 1935, and on the date of the entering of the order overruling motion for new trial, the court on application of the appellant herein modified and corrected the journal entry of judgment. Under the decisions of this court, such correction is made upon application after judgment and is not a part of the record. McCarthy v. Bentley, 16 Okla. 19, 83 P. 713; McCoy v. McCoy, 27 Okla. 371, 112 P. 1040. The appeal not having been taken within six months from the date of the rendition of the judgment on April 4, 1935, the cause must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.