BALLARD v. LEMMONS

Annotate this Case

BALLARD v. LEMMONS
1934 OK 153
30 P.2d 670
167 Okla. 471
Case Number: 22281
Decided: 03/13/1934
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BALLARD
v.
LEMMONS.

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Review--Reversal in Absence of Answer Brief.
Where plaintiff in error has served and filed his brief in compliance with the rules of court, but the defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for his failure to do so, the court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sustained, but may, where the authorities cited in the brief filed, appear reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, reverse the cause, with directions.

Appeal from District Court, Love County; Asa E. Walden, Judge.

Action by T. W. Lemmons against Tom Ballard. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions.

C. C. Wilkins, for plaintiff in error.
J. Woody Dixon, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 On the 28th day of February, 1931, the court entered its order making final a temporary injunction. Motion for new trial was duly filed, and on the 14th day of March, 1931, the court overruled the same and the cause was filed herein April 24, 1931. On the 6th day of July, 1932, plaintiff in error filed brief herein, and the defendant in error has failed to file brief or to offer excuse for such failure.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.