SILVERMAN v. MCMARTIN

SILVERMAN v. MCMARTIN
1934 OK 131
30 P.2d 155
167 Okla. 417
Case Number: 22745
Decided: 02/27/1934
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

SILVERMAN
v.
MCMARTIN et al.

Syllabus

¶0 Master and Servant--Workmen's Compensation--Review of Awards--Remand of Cause in Accordance With Confession of Error.
In a proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, when the petitioner files a confession of error and the record and the authorities reasonably support said confession of error, this court may in its discretion remand the cause to the State Industrial Commission with instructions to vacate the award in accordance with said confession of error.

Original proceedings by M. H. Silverman to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made to Fred C. McMartin, claimant. Award vacated.

C. H. Rosenstein, for petitioner.
Fred Davis, D. H. Evans, J.
Berry King, Atty. Gen., and Robt. D. Crowe, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 This original proceeding was begun by the petitioner, M. H. Silverman, by the filing of his petition August 20, 1931, to review an award made by the State Industrial Commission to Fred C. McMartin in cause No. 22688, Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. McMartin, 158 Okla. 107, 12 P.2d 226.

¶2 On the 3rd day of October, 1932, M. H. Silverman filed a denominated confession of error in which it is stipulated and agreed between M. H. Silverman, petitioner, and the respondents, Fred C. McMartin and the State Industrial Commission, that the claimant, Fred C. McMartin, was injured while engaged in performing labor on an oil and gas lease located in Creek county, Okla., and that the only interest petitioner, M. H. Silverman, ever had in said oil and gas lease was an assignment of a small undivided interest therein as security for certain indebtedness owing him from the assignor of said interest and that the relation of employer and employee never existed between the petitioner and the claimant, Fred C. McMartin; that the respondents, Fred C. McMartin and State Industrial Commission, therefore confess that there was error in the award rendered in this cause against the petitioner, M. H. Silverman, and state that the said award should be vacated as to the petitioner, M. H. Silverman, because as a matter of law the relationship of employer and employee did not exist between said M. H. Silverman and the claimant, Fred C. McMartin.