HARBOUR-LONGMIRE CO. v. OWREY

HARBOUR-LONGMIRE CO. v. OWREY
1934 OK 120
30 P.2d 163
167 Okla. 417
Case Number: 22781
Decided: 02/27/1934
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

HARBOUR-LONGMIRE CO. et al.
v.
OWREY.

Syllabus

¶0 Master and Servant--Workmen's Compensation--Review of Awards--Remand of Cause in Accordance With Confession of Error.
In a proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, when the claimant, respondent, files a confession of error and the record and the authorities reasonably support said confession of error, this court may in its discretion remand the cause to the State Industrial Commission with instructions to vacate the award in accordance with said confession of error.

Original proceedings by the Harbour-Longmire Company and its insurance carrier to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made to Mary H. Owrey. Upon confession of error proceedings remanded to the State Industrial Commission, with directions to respondent the State Industrial Commission to vacate its order allowing the award.

Owen & Looney, Paul N. Lindsey, and J. Fred Swanson, for petitioners.
J. Berry King, Atty. Gen., and Robt. D. Crowe, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Petitioner herein filed this original proceeding August 31, 1931, to review an award of the State Industrial Commission made on the 10th day of August, 1931, finding that claimant Mary Owrey was in the employ of the petitioner Harbour-Longmire Company and while in said employ sustained an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of her employment.

¶2 On the 19th day of August, 1932, the Attorney General, for the respondents, filed a confession of error in which it is stated that after careful examination of the record, facts, and decision of the court with reference to the claim, they have come to the conclusion that there is no evidence that she was engaged in a hazardous occupation at the time of the injury.

¶3 This court has held that where an original proceeding is begun to review an award of the State Industrial Commission, and the petitioner files a confession of error, this court will examine the record, and if it reasonably tends to support said confession of error, will remand the cause to the Commission, with directions in accordance with the said confession of error, Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp. v. Benefield, 164 Okla. 53, 22 P.2d 912.