SEMLER v. STATE ex rel. COM'RS OF THE LAND OFFICE

SEMLER v. STATE ex rel. COM'RS OF THE LAND OFFICE
1933 OK 49
20 P.2d 1041
163 Okla. 58
Case Number: 23220
Decided: 01/31/1933
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

SEMLER
v.
STATE ex rel. COM'RS OF THE LAND OFFICE

Syllabus

¶0 Appeal and Error--Dismissal of Appeal Where Record Insufficient to Adjudge Alleged Errors.
In order to perfect an appeal to this court by transcript or case-made it is necessary to bring enough of the proceedings to this court to adjudge the errors complained of, and where such is not done the purported appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Comanche County; E. L. Richardson, Judge.

Application for nunc pro tunc order by Nannie Semler, opposed by the State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land Office. Application denied and applicant appeals. Dismissed.

P. G. Fullerton, for plaintiff in error.
R. H. Couch and Dwight Malcolm, Co. Atty., for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

¶1 On December 24, 1931, petition in error and case-made was filed in the Supreme Court, and on February 4, 1932, brief of the plaintiff in error was filed. On April 18, 1932, the attorney for the Commissioners of the Land Office filed motion to dismiss, alleging that there is nothing before this court, and cited authorities in support of the same.

¶2 It appears on examination of the case-made that there are petition and a motion by the plaintiff in error and a ruling thereon by Judge Wells, a notice of application for nunc pro tunc order and a journal entry overruling the application for nunc pro tunc and certificate of the court clerk.

¶3 It is apparent from the argument of plaintiff in error that the errors complained of cannot be reviewed upon this record.