DIXON v. WINGFIELD

Annotate this Case

DIXON v. WINGFIELD
1929 OK 388
280 P. 1071
139 Okla. 12
Case Number: 17307
Decided: 10/01/1929
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

DIXON
v.
WINGFIELD.

Syllabus

Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 2.

Error from Court of Common Pleas, Tulsa County; Saul A. Yager, Judge.

Action between R. J. Dixon and Nannie Wingfield. An appeal from an order overruling a motion to vacate and set aside order dismissing cause of action. Reversed and remanded.

J. T. Lewellen, for plaintiff in error.

HALL, C.

ΒΆ1 Where the defendant in error has failed to file a brief, as provided for in rule 7 of the Supreme Court, or failed to give the court any excuse for such failure, and the brief of plaintiff in error reasonably sustains his assignments of error, the Supreme Court will not search the record to find some theory on which the judgment of the trial court, in favor of defendant in error, may be sustained.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.